法官認為,本案中雙方之間借用比特幣的交易行為,目前不受法律保護,此外,比特幣不具有種類物的屬性,在本案中不具有現實的可返回性也無法使用法定貨幣進行量化。最終法院駁回了訴訟請求。\n\n\n\n
\n民法典對於物是怎麼規定的,就是說,物是不動產和動產以及我們法律所規定權利作為物權客體的,但是比特幣顯然不是不動產,也不是動產,法律也沒有規定它為權利客體,所以從法律上講,它不能構成法律上的物。\n\n\n\n
最終裁定是駁回了原告的起訴,風險應該是要自負。\n\n\n\n\n
對此,中國網友議論紛紛,表示「照這個理由,借個房子,車子不還也無罪了」、「我他 X 借了別人一套遊戲王稀有卡牌,意思不具備貨幣性質就不還了?這法官像個弱智一樣,明知道比特幣價值還不被保護?」\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
tp钱包官网下载報導,近期江蘇有一位林姓男子因缺錢向徐姓男子借款,徐男因手頭上沒有足夠現金,改出借 341 枚 […]\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[21,20],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16"}],"collection":[{"href":"\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17,"href":"\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16\/revisions\/17"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}